[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08306754-3A1F-412C-98EB-448A1348A6DA@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:04:13 +0000
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
CC: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"kpsingh@...omium.org" <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: introduce BPF_F_PRESERVE_ELEMS for
perf event array
> On Sep 30, 2020, at 7:49 AM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
>
> On 9/29/20 11:56 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> [...]
>> +static void bpf_fd_array_map_clear(struct bpf_map *map);
>> +
>> +static void perf_event_fd_array_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
>> +{
>> + if (map->map_flags & BPF_F_PRESERVE_ELEMS)
>> + bpf_fd_array_map_clear(map);
>> + fd_array_map_free(map);
>> +}
>
> Not quite sure why you place that here and added the fwd declaration? If you
> place perf_event_fd_array_map_free() near perf_event_array_map_ops, then you
> also don't need the additional bpf_fd_array_map_clear declaration.
Yeah.. I misread the line number...
Fixing it in v3.
Thanks,
Song
Powered by blists - more mailing lists