| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <3cfb2b799a62d22c6e7ae5897c23940bdcc24cbc.1601477936.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:18:19 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: ast@...nel.org
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com, kafai@...com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/6] bpf, selftests: use bpf_tail_call_static where appropriate
For those locations where we use an immediate tail call map index use the
newly added bpf_tail_call_static() helper.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
---
samples/bpf/sockex3_kern.c | 20 +++++++------
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_flow.c | 12 ++++----
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall1.c | 28 +++++++++----------
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall2.c | 14 +++++-----
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall3.c | 4 +--
.../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf1.c | 4 +--
.../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf2.c | 6 ++--
.../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf3.c | 6 ++--
.../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c | 6 ++--
9 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/samples/bpf/sockex3_kern.c b/samples/bpf/sockex3_kern.c
index cab9cca0b8eb..8142d02b33e6 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/sockex3_kern.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/sockex3_kern.c
@@ -31,28 +31,30 @@ struct {
#define PARSE_IP 3
#define PARSE_IPV6 4
-/* protocol dispatch routine.
- * It tail-calls next BPF program depending on eth proto
- * Note, we could have used:
- * bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, proto);
- * but it would need large prog_array
+/* Protocol dispatch routine. It tail-calls next BPF program depending
+ * on eth proto. Note, we could have used ...
+ *
+ * bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, proto);
+ *
+ * ... but it would need large prog_array and cannot be optimised given
+ * the map key is not static.
*/
static inline void parse_eth_proto(struct __sk_buff *skb, u32 proto)
{
switch (proto) {
case ETH_P_8021Q:
case ETH_P_8021AD:
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, PARSE_VLAN);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, PARSE_VLAN);
break;
case ETH_P_MPLS_UC:
case ETH_P_MPLS_MC:
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, PARSE_MPLS);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, PARSE_MPLS);
break;
case ETH_P_IP:
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, PARSE_IP);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, PARSE_IP);
break;
case ETH_P_IPV6:
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, PARSE_IPV6);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, PARSE_IPV6);
break;
}
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_flow.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_flow.c
index de6de9221518..5a65f6b51377 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_flow.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_flow.c
@@ -118,18 +118,18 @@ static __always_inline int parse_eth_proto(struct __sk_buff *skb, __be16 proto)
switch (proto) {
case bpf_htons(ETH_P_IP):
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, IP);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, IP);
break;
case bpf_htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, IPV6);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, IPV6);
break;
case bpf_htons(ETH_P_MPLS_MC):
case bpf_htons(ETH_P_MPLS_UC):
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, MPLS);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, MPLS);
break;
case bpf_htons(ETH_P_8021Q):
case bpf_htons(ETH_P_8021AD):
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, VLAN);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, VLAN);
break;
default:
/* Protocol not supported */
@@ -246,10 +246,10 @@ static __always_inline int parse_ipv6_proto(struct __sk_buff *skb, __u8 nexthdr)
switch (nexthdr) {
case IPPROTO_HOPOPTS:
case IPPROTO_DSTOPTS:
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, IPV6OP);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, IPV6OP);
break;
case IPPROTO_FRAGMENT:
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, IPV6FR);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, IPV6FR);
break;
default:
return parse_ip_proto(skb, nexthdr);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall1.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall1.c
index 1f407e65ae52..7115bcefbe8a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall1.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall1.c
@@ -26,20 +26,20 @@ int entry(struct __sk_buff *skb)
/* Multiple locations to make sure we patch
* all of them.
*/
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
-
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
-
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
+
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
+
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
return 3;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall2.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall2.c
index a093e739cf0e..0431e4fe7efd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall2.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall2.c
@@ -13,14 +13,14 @@ struct {
SEC("classifier/0")
int bpf_func_0(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
return 0;
}
SEC("classifier/1")
int bpf_func_1(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
return 1;
}
@@ -33,25 +33,25 @@ int bpf_func_2(struct __sk_buff *skb)
SEC("classifier/3")
int bpf_func_3(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 4);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 4);
return 3;
}
SEC("classifier/4")
int bpf_func_4(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 3);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 3);
return 4;
}
SEC("classifier")
int entry(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
/* Check multi-prog update. */
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
/* Check tail call limit. */
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 3);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 3);
return 3;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall3.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall3.c
index cabda877cf0a..739dc2a51e74 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall3.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall3.c
@@ -16,14 +16,14 @@ SEC("classifier/0")
int bpf_func_0(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
count++;
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
return 1;
}
SEC("classifier")
int entry(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf1.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf1.c
index b5d9c8e778ae..0103f3dd9f02 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf1.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf1.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ TAIL_FUNC(1)
static __noinline
int subprog_tail(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
return skb->len * 2;
}
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ int subprog_tail(struct __sk_buff *skb)
SEC("classifier")
int entry(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
return subprog_tail(skb);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf2.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf2.c
index a004ab28ce28..7b1c04183824 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf2.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf2.c
@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ static __noinline
int subprog_tail(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
if (load_byte(skb, 0))
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
else
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
return 1;
}
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ int bpf_func_0(struct __sk_buff *skb)
SEC("classifier")
int entry(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf3.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf3.c
index 96dbef2b6b7c..0d5482bea6c9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf3.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf3.c
@@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ int subprog_tail2(struct __sk_buff *skb)
volatile char arr[64] = {};
if (load_word(skb, 0) || load_half(skb, 0))
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 10);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 10);
else
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
return skb->len;
}
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ int subprog_tail(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
volatile char arr[64] = {};
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
return skb->len * 2;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c
index 98b40a95bc67..9a1b166b7fbe 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c
@@ -14,21 +14,21 @@ static volatile int count;
__noinline
int subprog_tail_2(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
return skb->len * 3;
}
__noinline
int subprog_tail_1(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
return skb->len * 2;
}
__noinline
int subprog_tail(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
- bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
return skb->len;
}
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists