netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 00/12] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:39:07 +0200
From:   Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        sameehj@...zon.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
        ast@...nel.org, shayagr@...zon.com, brouer@...hat.com,
        echaudro@...hat.com, lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com,
        dsahern@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 00/12] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer
 support

> On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:41:51 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > This series introduce XDP multi-buffer support. The mvneta driver is
> > the first to support these new "non-linear" xdp_{buff,frame}. Reviewers
> > please focus on how these new types of xdp_{buff,frame} packets
> > traverse the different layers and the layout design. It is on purpose
> > that BPF-helpers are kept simple, as we don't want to expose the
> > internal layout to allow later changes.
> 
> This does not apply cleanly to net-next 🤔

Hi Jakub,

patch 12/12 ("bpf: cpumap: introduce xdp multi-buff support") is based on commit
efa90b50934c ("cpumap: Remove rcpu pointer from cpu_map_build_skb signature")
already in bpf-next. I though it was important to add patch 12/12 to the
series. Do you have other conflicts?

Regards,
Lorenzo

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)