[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200930201816.1032054-2-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:18:04 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Thomas Kopp <thomas.kopp@...rochip.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] can: mcp25xxfd: mcp25xxfd_handle_eccif(): add ECC related errata and update log messages
From: Thomas Kopp <thomas.kopp@...rochip.com>
This patch adds a reference to the recent released MCP2517FD and MCP2518FD
errata sheets and paste the explanation.
The single error correction does not always work, so always indicate that a
single error occurred. If the location of the ECC error is outside of the
TX-RAM always use netdev_notice() to log the problem. For ECC errors in the
TX-RAM, there is a recovery procedure.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kopp <thomas.kopp@...rochip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200925065606.358-1-thomas.kopp@microchip.com
[mkl: split into two patches, adjust subject and commit message]
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
---
.../net/can/spi/mcp25xxfd/mcp25xxfd-core.c | 21 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp25xxfd/mcp25xxfd-core.c b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp25xxfd/mcp25xxfd-core.c
index bd2ba981ae36..106dda8e5310 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp25xxfd/mcp25xxfd-core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp25xxfd/mcp25xxfd-core.c
@@ -1973,8 +1973,20 @@ mcp25xxfd_handle_eccif(struct mcp25xxfd_priv *priv, bool set_normal_mode)
else
return err;
+ /* Errata Reference:
+ * mcp2517fd: DS80000789B, mcp2518fd: DS80000792C 2.
+ *
+ * ECC single error correction does not work in all cases:
+ *
+ * Fix/Work Around:
+ * Enable single error correction and double error detection
+ * interrupts by setting SECIE and DEDIE. Handle SECIF as a
+ * detection interrupt and do not rely on the error
+ * correction. Instead, handle both interrupts as a
+ * notification that the RAM word at ERRADDR was corrupted.
+ */
if (ecc_stat & MCP25XXFD_REG_ECCSTAT_SECIF)
- msg = "Single ECC Error corrected at address";
+ msg = "Single ECC Error detected at address";
else if (ecc_stat & MCP25XXFD_REG_ECCSTAT_DEDIF)
msg = "Double ECC Error detected at address";
else
@@ -1983,12 +1995,7 @@ mcp25xxfd_handle_eccif(struct mcp25xxfd_priv *priv, bool set_normal_mode)
if (!in_tx_ram) {
ecc->ecc_stat = 0;
- if (ecc_stat & MCP25XXFD_REG_ECCSTAT_SECIF)
- netdev_info(priv->ndev, "%s 0x%04x.\n",
- msg, addr);
- else
- netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "%s 0x%04x.\n",
- msg, addr);
+ netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "%s 0x%04x.\n", msg, addr);
} else {
/* Re-occurring error? */
if (ecc->ecc_stat == ecc_stat) {
--
2.28.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists