lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:55:26 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Srinivasan Raju <srini.raju@...elifi.com>,
        mostafa.afgani@...elifi.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] wireless: Initial driver submission for pureLiFi
 devices

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:01:27AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> writes:
>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/Kconfig
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/Kconfig
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..ff05eaf0a8d4
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/Kconfig
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> +config WLAN_VENDOR_PURELIFI
> >> +	bool "pureLiFi devices"
> >> +	default y
> >
> > "N" is preferred default.
>
> In most cases that's true, but for WLAN_VENDOR_ configs 'default y'
> should be used. It's the same as with NET_VENDOR_.

I would like to challenge it, why is that?
Why do I need to set "N", every time new vendor upstreams its code?

Thanks

>
>
> --
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
>
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Powered by blists - more mailing lists