netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: Support bridge 802.1Q while untagging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <30265d9b-fb50-16a7-fb08-1199762a14b3@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:16:56 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: Support bridge 802.1Q while untagging



On 9/30/2020 4:29 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/30/2020 1:43 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:31:03PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> While we are it, call __vlan_find_dev_deep_rcu() which makes use the
>>> VLAN group array which is faster.
>>
>> Not just "while at it", but I do wonder whether it isn't, in fact,
>> called "deep" for a reason:
>>
>>         /*
>>          * Lower devices of master uppers (bonding, team) do not have
>>          * grp assigned to themselves. Grp is assigned to upper device
>>          * instead.
>>          */
>>
>> I haven't tested this, but I wonder if you could actually call
>> __vlan_find_dev_deep_rcu() on the switch port interface and it would
>> cover both this and the bridge having an 8021q upper automatically?
> 
> Let me give this a try.

We hit the if (vlan_info) branch and we do not recurse through the 
upper_dev because of that.

I still need to send a v2 to remove the now unused 'iter' variable and 
fix up the bridge iproute2 command (there is no vlan_filtering=0 it is 
vlan_filtering 0).
-- 
Florian