[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <160156436403.1728886.6524119306801766435.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 15:59:24 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 23/23] rxrpc: rxkad: Don't use pskb_pull() to advance
through the response packet
In the rxkad security class, don't use pskb_pull() to advance through the
contents of the response packet. There's no point, especially as the next
and last access to the skbuff still has to allow for the wire header in the
offset (which we didn't advance over).
Better to just add the displacement to the next offset.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
net/rxrpc/rxkad.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c b/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c
index f3182edfcbae..e5b4bbdd0f34 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c
@@ -1162,8 +1162,6 @@ static int rxkad_verify_response(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
if (skb_copy_bits(skb, sizeof(struct rxrpc_wire_header),
response, sizeof(*response)) < 0)
goto protocol_error;
- if (!pskb_pull(skb, sizeof(*response)))
- BUG();
version = ntohl(response->version);
ticket_len = ntohl(response->ticket_len);
@@ -1194,7 +1192,7 @@ static int rxkad_verify_response(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
eproto = tracepoint_string("rxkad_tkt_short");
abort_code = RXKADPACKETSHORT;
- if (skb_copy_bits(skb, sizeof(struct rxrpc_wire_header),
+ if (skb_copy_bits(skb, sizeof(struct rxrpc_wire_header) + sizeof(*response),
ticket, ticket_len) < 0)
goto protocol_error_free;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists