netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 06/12] bpf: helpers: add multibuffer support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201001154435.GF13449@lore-desk>
Date:   Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:44:35 +0200
From:   Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, sameehj@...zon.com,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, shayagr@...zon.com,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 06/12] bpf: helpers: add multibuffer support

[...]
> > >
> > > Please route the set via bpf-next otherwise merge conflicts will be severe.
> >
> > ack, fine
> >
> > in bpf-next the following two commits (available in net-next) are currently missing:
> > - 632bb64f126a: net: mvneta: try to use in-irq pp cache in mvneta_txq_bufs_free
> > - 879456bedbe5: net: mvneta: avoid possible cache misses in mvneta_rx_swbm
> >
> > is it ok to rebase bpf-next ontop of net-next in order to post all the series
> > in bpf-next? Or do you prefer to post mvneta patches in net-next and bpf
> > related changes in bpf-next when it will rebased ontop of net-next?
> 
> bpf-next will receive these patches later today,
> so I prefer the whole thing on top of bpf-next at that time.

sounds good, thx.

Regards,
Lorenzo

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)