netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 04/16] devlink: Add reload stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201001142521.0c9ac25c@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:25:21 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/16] devlink: Add reload stats

On Thu,  1 Oct 2020 16:59:07 +0300 Moshe Shemesh wrote:
> Add reload stats to hold the history per reload action type and limit.
> 
> For example, the number of times fw_activate has been performed on this
> device since the driver module was added or if the firmware activation
> was performed with or without reset.
> 
> Add devlink notification on stats update.
> 
> Expose devlink reload stats to the user through devlink dev get command.
> 
> Examples:
> $ devlink dev show
> pci/0000:82:00.0:
>   stats:
>       reload_stats:
>         driver_reinit 2
>         fw_activate 1
>         fw_activate_no_reset 0
> pci/0000:82:00.1:
>   stats:
>       reload_stats:
>         driver_reinit 1
>         fw_activate 0
>         fw_activate_no_reset 0
> 
> $ devlink dev show -jp
> {
>     "dev": {
>         "pci/0000:82:00.0": {
>             "stats": {
>                 "reload_stats": [ {
>                         "driver_reinit": 2
>                     },{
>                         "fw_activate": 1
>                     },{
>                         "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>                     } ]
>             }
>         },
>         "pci/0000:82:00.1": {
>             "stats": {
>                 "reload_stats": [ {
>                         "driver_reinit": 1
>                     },{
>                         "fw_activate": 0
>                     },{
>                         "fw_activate_no_reset": 0
>                     } ]

This will be a question to the user space part but IDK why every stat
is in a separate object?

Instead of doing an array of objects -> [ {}, {}, {} ]
make "reload_stats" itself an object.

>             }
>         }
>     }
> }
> 
> Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>

Minor nits, looks good overall:

Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>

> diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
> index 6de7d6aa6ed1..05516f1e4c3e 100644
> --- a/net/core/devlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
> @@ -500,10 +500,68 @@ devlink_reload_limit_is_supported(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_l
>  	return test_bit(limit, &devlink->ops->reload_limits);
>  }
>  
> +static int devlink_reload_stat_put(struct sk_buff *msg, enum devlink_reload_action action,
> +				   enum devlink_reload_limit limit, u32 value)
> +{
> +	struct nlattr *reload_stats_entry;
> +
> +	reload_stats_entry = nla_nest_start(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_STATS_ENTRY);
> +	if (!reload_stats_entry)
> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> +	if (nla_put_u8(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION, action))
> +		goto nla_put_failure;
> +	if (nla_put_u8(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_LIMIT, limit))
> +		goto nla_put_failure;
> +	if (nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_STATS_VALUE, value))
> +		goto nla_put_failure;

nit: it's common to combine such expressions into:

if (nla_put...() ||
    nla_put...() ||
    nla_put...())
    goto ...;

> +	nla_nest_end(msg, reload_stats_entry);
> +	return 0;
> +
> +nla_put_failure:
> +	nla_nest_cancel(msg, reload_stats_entry);
> +	return -EMSGSIZE;
> +}
> +
> +static int devlink_reload_stats_put(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink)
> +{
> +	struct nlattr *reload_stats_attr;
> +	int i, j, stat_idx;
> +	u32 value;
> +
> +	reload_stats_attr = nla_nest_start(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_STATS);
> +
> +	if (!reload_stats_attr)
> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> +	for (j = 0; j <= DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_MAX; j++) {
> +		if (j != DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_UNSPEC &&

Why check this? It can't be supported.

> +		    !devlink_reload_limit_is_supported(devlink, j))
> +			continue;
> +		for (i = 0; i <= DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX; i++) {
> +			if (!devlink_reload_action_is_supported(devlink, i) ||
> +			    devlink_reload_combination_is_invalid(i, j))

Again, devlink instance would not have been registered with invalid
combinations, right?

> +				continue;
> +
> +			stat_idx = j * __DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX + i;
> +			value = devlink->reload_stats[stat_idx];
> +			if (devlink_reload_stat_put(msg, i, j, value))
> +				goto nla_put_failure;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	nla_nest_end(msg, reload_stats_attr);
> +	return 0;
> +
> +nla_put_failure:
> +	nla_nest_cancel(msg, reload_stats_attr);
> +	return -EMSGSIZE;
> +}


> @@ -3004,6 +3072,34 @@ bool devlink_is_reload_failed(const struct devlink *devlink)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_is_reload_failed);
>  
> +static void
> +__devlink_reload_stats_update(struct devlink *devlink, u32 *reload_stats,
> +			      enum devlink_reload_limit limit, unsigned long actions_performed)

> +	for (action = 0; action <= DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX; action++) {

nit: for_each_set_bit

> +		if (!test_bit(action, &actions_performed))
> +			continue;
> +		stat_idx = limit * __DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX + action;
> +		reload_stats[stat_idx]++;
> +	}
> +	devlink_notify(devlink, DEVLINK_CMD_NEW);
> +}