netdev - Re: [iproute2-next v2 1/1] devlink: display elapsed time during flash update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:17:01 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
Subject: Re: [iproute2-next v2 1/1] devlink: display elapsed time during
 flash update

Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 01:40:12AM CEST, jacob.e.keller@...el.com wrote:
>For some devices, updating the flash can take significant time during
>operations where no status can meaningfully be reported. This can be
>somewhat confusing to a user who sees devlink appear to hang on the
>terminal waiting for the device to update.
>
>Recent changes to the kernel interface allow such long running commands
>to provide a timeout value indicating some upper bound on how long the
>relevant action could take.
>
>Provide a ticking counter of the time elapsed since the previous status
>message in order to make it clear that the program is not simply stuck.
>
>Display this message whenever the status message from the kernel
>indicates a timeout value. Additionally also display the message if
>we've received no status for more than couple of seconds. If we elapse
>more than the timeout provided by the status message, replace the
>timeout display with "timeout reached".
>
>Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>

Looks nice. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>