[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201002120228.3451337-7-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 15:02:25 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, andrew@...n.ch,
f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com, joergen.andreasen@...rochip.com,
allan.nielsen@...rochip.com, alexandru.marginean@....com,
claudiu.manoil@....com, xiaoliang.yang_1@....com,
hongbo.wang@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
jiri@...nulli.us, idosch@...sch.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 6/9] net: mscc: ocelot: only install TCAM entries into a specific lookup and PAG
We were installing TCAM rules with the LOOKUP field as unmasked, meaning
that all entries were matching on all lookups. Now that lookups are
exposed as individual chains, let's make the LOOKUP explicit when
offloading TCAM entries.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
Changes since RFC:
None.
drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c | 10 ++++++----
drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
index feeaf016f8ca..b26a5f8dc62d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
@@ -164,6 +164,8 @@ static int ocelot_flower_parse_action(struct flow_cls_offload *f, bool ingress,
}
if (filter->block_id == VCAP_IS1 || filter->block_id == VCAP_IS2)
filter->lookup = ocelot_chain_to_lookup(chain);
+ if (filter->block_id == VCAP_IS2)
+ filter->pag = ocelot_chain_to_pag(chain);
filter->goto_target = -1;
filter->type = OCELOT_VCAP_FILTER_DUMMY;
@@ -205,9 +207,10 @@ static int ocelot_flower_parse_action(struct flow_cls_offload *f, bool ingress,
filter->type = OCELOT_VCAP_FILTER_OFFLOAD;
break;
case FLOW_ACTION_POLICE:
- if (filter->block_id != VCAP_IS2) {
+ if (filter->block_id != VCAP_IS2 ||
+ filter->lookup != 0) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
- "Police action can only be offloaded to VCAP IS2");
+ "Police action can only be offloaded to VCAP IS2 lookup 0");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
if (filter->goto_target != -1) {
@@ -259,8 +262,7 @@ static int ocelot_flower_parse_action(struct flow_cls_offload *f, bool ingress,
case FLOW_ACTION_GOTO:
filter->goto_target = a->chain_index;
- if (filter->block_id == VCAP_IS1 &&
- ocelot_chain_to_lookup(chain) == 2) {
+ if (filter->block_id == VCAP_IS1 && filter->lookup == 2) {
int pag = ocelot_chain_to_pag(filter->goto_target);
filter->action.pag_override_mask = 0xff;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c
index d0e5c5bbdbf8..0656e146129a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c
@@ -367,7 +367,10 @@ static void is2_entry_set(struct ocelot *ocelot, int ix,
data.type = IS2_ACTION_TYPE_NORMAL;
- vcap_key_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS2_HK_PAG, 0, 0);
+ vcap_key_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS2_HK_PAG, filter->pag, 0xff);
+ vcap_key_bit_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS2_HK_FIRST,
+ (filter->lookup == 0) ? OCELOT_VCAP_BIT_1 :
+ OCELOT_VCAP_BIT_0);
vcap_key_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS2_HK_IGR_PORT_MASK, 0,
~filter->ingress_port_mask);
vcap_key_bit_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS2_HK_FIRST, OCELOT_VCAP_BIT_ANY);
@@ -688,6 +691,7 @@ static void is1_entry_set(struct ocelot *ocelot, int ix,
if (filter->prio != 0)
data.tg |= data.tg_value;
+ vcap_key_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS1_HK_LOOKUP, filter->lookup, 0x3);
vcap_key_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS1_HK_IGR_PORT_MASK, 0,
~filter->ingress_port_mask);
vcap_key_bit_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS1_HK_L2_MC, filter->dmac_mc);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists