netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] genetlink: support per-command policy dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 02 Oct 2020 17:28:53 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, jiri@...nulli.us,
        mkubecek@...e.cz, dsahern@...nel.org, pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] genetlink: support per-command policy
 dump

On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 08:25 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> 
> > I suppose, I thought you wanted to change it to have separate dump/do
> > policies? Whatever you like there, I don't really care much :)
> 
> I just want to make the uAPI future-proof for now.

Yeah, makes sense.

> At a quick look ethtool doesn't really accept any attributes but
> headers for GET requests. DO and DUMP are the same there so it's 
> not a priority for me.

OK.

> > But I can also change my patches later to separately advertise dump/do
> > policies, and simply always use the same one for now.
> 
> Right that was what I was thinking. Basically:
> 
> 	if ((op.doit && nla_put_u32(skb, CTRL_whatever_DO, idx)) ||
> 	    (op.dumpit && nla_put_u32(skb, CTRL_whatever_DUMP, idx)))
> 		goto nla_put_failure;

Right, easy enough.

> > But this series does conflict with the little bugfix I also sent, could
> > you please take a look?
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201002094604.480c760e3c47.I7811da1539351a26cd0e5a10b98a8842cfbc1b55@changeid/
> > 
> > I'm not really sure how to handle.
> 
> Yeah, just noticed that one now :S

Yeah, sorry ... The conflicts indeed weren't difficult, but non-trivial
unless you know what's going on in each side. I pushed them to my
mac80211-next tree, in the genetlink-op-policy-export branch (not sure
you saw my patches and cover letter yet :) )

I'll wait for this to get resolved and then respin my patches with the
above doit/dumpit after your series is in, and will also respin the
userspace side then.

johannes