[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6adbdd333e2db1ab9ac8f08e8ad3263d43bde55e.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 23:00:15 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
jiri@...nulli.us, mkubecek@...e.cz, dsahern@...nel.org,
pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] genetlink: support per-command policy
dump
On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 22:59 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 13:50 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > My thinking was that until kernel actually start using separate dump
> > policies user space can assume policy 0 is relevant. But yeah, merging
> > your changes first would probably be best.
>
> Works for me. I have it based on yours. Just updated my branch (top
> commit is 4d5045adfe90), but I'll probably only actually email it out
> once things are a bit more settled wrt. your changes.
Forgot the link ...
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jberg/mac80211-next.git/log/?h=genetlink-op-policy-export
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists