netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] genetlink: support per-command policy dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201001173644.74ed67da@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:36:44 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, johannes@...solutions.net,
        jiri@...nulli.us, mkubecek@...e.cz, dsahern@...nel.org,
        pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] genetlink: support per-command policy
 dump

On Thu,  1 Oct 2020 15:59:23 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> The objective of this series is to dump ethtool policies
> to be able to tell which flags are supported by the kernel.
> Current release adds ETHTOOL_FLAG_STATS for dumping extra
> stats, but because of strict checking we need to make sure
> that the flag is actually supported before setting it in
> a request.

Do we need support for separate .doit and .dumpit policies?
Or is that an overkill?