lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 02 Oct 2020 19:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     anant.thazhemadam@...il.com
Cc:     mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
        john.fastabend@...il.com,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH 0/2] reorder members of
 structures in virtio_net for optimization

From: Anant Thazhemadam <anant.thazhemadam@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:47:20 +0530

> The structures virtnet_info and receive_queue have byte holes in 
> middle, and their members could do with some rearranging 
> (order-of-declaration wise) in order to overcome this.
> 
> Rearranging the members helps in:
>   * elimination the byte holes in the middle of the structures
>   * reduce the size of the structure (virtnet_info)
>   * have more members stored in one cache line (as opposed to 
>     unnecessarily crossing the cacheline boundary and spanning
>     different cachelines)
> 
> The analysis was performed using pahole.
> 
> These patches may be applied in any order.

What effects do these changes have on performance?

The cache locality for various TX and RX paths could be effected.

I'm not applying these patches without some data on the performance
impact.

Thank you.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists