netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 02/16] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 4 Oct 2020 09:30:48 +0300
From:   Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>
CC:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/16] devlink: Add reload action option to
 devlink reload command


On 10/2/2020 6:19 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 03:59:05PM CEST, moshe@...lanox.com wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
>> diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
>> index 1c286e9a3590..ddba63bce7ad 100644
>> --- a/include/net/devlink.h
>> +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
>> @@ -1077,10 +1077,11 @@ struct devlink_ops {
>> 	 * implemementation.
>> 	 */
>> 	u32 supported_flash_update_params;
>> +	unsigned long reload_actions;
>> 	int (*reload_down)(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
>> -			   struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> -	int (*reload_up)(struct devlink *devlink,
>> -			 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> +			   enum devlink_reload_action action, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> +	int (*reload_up)(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
>> +			 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed);
> Nit. Could you please push extack to be the last arg here? It is common
> to have extack as the last arg + action and actions_performed are going
> to be side by side.


Sure.

> Otherwise the patch looks fine.
> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>