[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201004071433.GA212114@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 09:14:33 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, tuba@....ufl.edu
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, oneukum@...e.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: hso: do not call unregister if not registered
On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 05:00:42PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 13:43:23 +0200
>
> > @@ -2366,7 +2366,8 @@ static void hso_free_net_device(struct hso_device *hso_dev, bool bailout)
> >
> > remove_net_device(hso_net->parent);
> >
> > - if (hso_net->net)
> > + if (hso_net->net &&
> > + hso_net->net->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED)
> > unregister_netdev(hso_net->net);
> >
> > /* start freeing */
>
> I really want to get out of the habit of drivers testing the internal
> netdev registration state to make decisions.
>
> Instead, please track this internally. You know if you registered the
> device or not, therefore use that to control whether you try to
> unregister it or not.
Fair enough. Tuba, do you want to fix this up in this way, or do you
recommend that someone else do it?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists