lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:19:44 +0200 From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> To: Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@...lbox.org> Cc: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: serial: qmi_wwan: add Cellient MPL200 card On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:06:12AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 08:30:42PM +0200, Wilken Gottwalt wrote: > > Oh sorry, looks like I got it mixed up a bit. It was my first attempt to submit > > a patch set. Which is the best way to resubmit an update if the other part of > > the patch set gets accepted? The documentation about re-/submitting patch sets > > is a bit thin. > > Just send these as individual patches (not a series) as they are > independent and go through separate trees. > > Also, I never received the USB serial patch, only this one, so you need > to resend both anyway. Found it flagged spam, so no need to resend that one. Just resend the networking one with a v2 prefix. In general, you could mention in a changelog in the cover letter that you've removed patches that have already been applied. Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists