[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1ee6179d667fee17e2f6d9582a85669d6792cf7.camel@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 14:53:00 +0000
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>
To: "bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"henrik.bjoernlund@...rochip.com" <henrik.bjoernlund@...rochip.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jiri@...lanox.com" <jiri@...lanox.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
"idosch@...lanox.com" <idosch@...lanox.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
CC: "horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com" <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next v2 09/11] bridge: cfm: Bridge port remove.
On Thu, 2020-10-01 at 10:30 +0000, Henrik Bjoernlund wrote:
> This is addition of CFM functionality to delete MEP instances
> on a port that is removed from the bridge.
> A MEP can only exist on a port that is related to a bridge.
>
> Reviewed-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Bjoernlund <henrik.bjoernlund@...rochip.com>m
> ---
> net/bridge/br_cfm.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> net/bridge/br_if.c | 1 +
> net/bridge/br_private.h | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
This patch should be a part of the one which adds the ability to attach MEPs to
ports so they will get cleaned up properly on port del in the same patch.
Is there a reason for it to be a separate patch?
One more comment below.
Thanks,
Nik
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_cfm.c b/net/bridge/br_cfm.c
> index 6fbfef44c235..fc8268cb76c1 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_cfm.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_cfm.c
> @@ -867,3 +867,16 @@ bool br_cfm_created(struct net_bridge *br)
> {
> return !hlist_empty(&br->mep_list);
> }
> +
> +/* Deletes the CFM instances on a specific bridge port
> + */
> +void br_cfm_port_del(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *port)
> +{
> + struct br_cfm_mep *mep;
> +
> + ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> + hlist_for_each_entry(mep, &br->mep_list, head)
hlist_for_each_entry_safe()
> + if (mep->create.ifindex == port->dev->ifindex)
> + mep_delete_implementation(br, mep);
> +}
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/bridge/br_if.c
> index a0e9a7937412..f7d2f472ae24 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c
> @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static void del_nbp(struct net_bridge_port *p)
> spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
>
> br_mrp_port_del(br, p);
> + br_cfm_port_del(br, p);
>
> br_ifinfo_notify(RTM_DELLINK, NULL, p);
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> index 5954ee45af80..735dd0028b40 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> @@ -1465,6 +1465,7 @@ static inline int br_mrp_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_bridge *br)
> int br_cfm_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
> struct nlattr *attr, int cmd, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> bool br_cfm_created(struct net_bridge *br);
> +void br_cfm_port_del(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p);
> int br_cfm_config_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_bridge *br);
> int br_cfm_status_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct net_bridge *br,
> @@ -1484,6 +1485,11 @@ static inline bool br_cfm_created(struct net_bridge *br)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static inline void br_cfm_port_del(struct net_bridge *br,
> + struct net_bridge_port *p)
> +{
> +}
> +
> static inline int br_cfm_config_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_bridge *br)
> {
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists