Message-ID: <CAH=CPzqSsnJK10+ei6f3qV3ZQ5iqkZQQ0XVkHXWpsnO18=K-0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2020 01:32:46 +0530
From:   Numan Siddique <nusiddiq@...hat.com>
To:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc:     ovs dev <dev@...nvswitch.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        davem@...emloft.net, Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>,
        Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: openvswitch: Add support to lookup invalid
 packet in ct action.

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 12:22 AM Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
>
> Numan Siddique <nusiddiq@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 4:46 PM Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > nusiddiq@...hat.com <nusiddiq@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > > From: Numan Siddique <nusiddiq@...hat.com>
> > > >
> > > > For a tcp packet which is part of an existing committed connection,
> > > > nf_conntrack_in() will return err and set skb->_nfct to NULL if it is
> > > > out of tcp window. ct action for this packet will set the ct_state
> > > > to +inv which is as expected.
> > >
> > > This is because from conntrack p.o.v., such TCP packet is NOT part of
> > > the existing connection.
> > >
> > > For example, because it is considered part of a previous incarnation
> > > of the same connection.
> > >
> > > > But a controller cannot add an OVS flow as
> > > >
> > > > table=21,priority=100,ct_state=+inv, actions=drop
> > > >
> > > > to drop such packets. That is because when ct action is executed on other
> > > > packets which are not part of existing committed connections, ct_state
> > > > can be set to invalid. Few such cases are:
> > > >    - ICMP reply packets.
> > >
> > > Can you elaborate? Echo reply should not be invalid. Conntrack should
> > > mark it as established (unless such echo reply came out of the blue).
> >
> > Hi Florian,
> >
> > Thanks for providing the comments.
> >
> > Sorry for not being very clear.
> >
> > Let me brief about the present problem we see in OVN (which is a
> > controller using ovs)
> >
> > When a VM/container sends a packet (in the ingress direction), we don't send all
> > the packets to conntrack. If a packet is destined to an OVN load
> > balancer virtual ip,
> > only then we send the packet to conntrack in the ingress direction and
> > then we do dnat
> > to the backend.
>
> Ah, okay.  That explains the INVALID then, but in that case I think this
> patch/direction is less desirable from conntrack point of view.
>
> More below.
>
> > table=1, match = (ip && ip4.dst == VIP) action = ct(table=2)
> > tablle=2, ct_state=+new+trk && ip4.dst == VIP, action = ct(commit,
> > nat=BACKEND_IP)
> > ...
> > ..
> >
> > However for the egress direction (when the packet is to be delivered
> > to the VM/container),
> > we send all the packets to conntrack and if the ct.est is set, we do
> > undnat before delivering
> > the packet to the VM/container.
> > ...
> > table=40, match = ip, action = ct(table=41)
> > table=41, match = ct_state=+est+trk, action = ct(nat)
> > ...
> >
> > What I mean here is that, since we send all the packets in the egress
> > pipeline to conntrack,
> > we can't add a flow like - match = ct_state=+inv, action = drop.
>
> Basically this is like a normal routing/netfitler (no ovs), where
> the machine in question only sees unidirectional traffic (reply packets
> taking different route).
>
> > i.e When a VM/container sends an ICMP request packet, it will not be
> > sent to conntrack, but
> > the reply ICMP will be sent to conntrack and it will be marked as invalid.
>
> Yes.  For plain netfilter, the solution would be to accept INVALID icmp
> replies in the iptables/nftables ruleset.
>
> > So is the case with TCP, the TCP SYN from the VM is not sent to
> > conntrack, but the SYN/ACK
> > from the server would be sent to conntrack and it will be marked as invalid.
>
> Right.
>
> > > 1. packet was not even seen by conntrack
> > > 2. packet matches existing connection, but is "bad", for example:
> > >   - contradicting tcp flags
> > >   - out of window
> > >   - invalid checksum
> >
> > We want the below to be solved (using OVS flows) :
> >   - If the packet is marked as invalid due to (2) which you mentioned above,
> >     we would like to read the ct_mark and ct_label fields as the packet is
> >     part of existing connection, so that we can add an OVS flow like
> >
> > ct_state=+inv+trk,ct_label=0x2 actions=drop
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to let tcp conntrack skip the in-window
> check?  AFAIU thats the only problem and its identical to other cases
> that we have at the moment, for example, conntrack supports mid-stream
> pickup (on by default) which also disables tcp window checks.
>
> > I tested by setting 'be_liberal' sysctl flag and since skb->_nfct was
> > set for (2), OVS
> > datapath module set the ct_state to +est.
>
> Yes.  This flag can be set programatically on a per-ct basis.
>
> See nft_flow_offload_eval() for example (BE_LIBERAL).
> Given we now have multiple places that set this I think it would make
> sense to add a helper, say, e.g.
>
> void nf_ct_tcp_be_liberal(struct nf_conn *ct);
> ?
>
> (Or perhaps nf_ct_tcp_disable_window_checks() , might be more
>  clear/descriptive as to what this is doing).
>
> Do you think that this resolves the OVN problem?

Thanks for the comments. I think this should resolve the problem for OVN.

Numan

>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists