lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 6 Oct 2020 19:04:01 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/bpf: Fix test_verifier after introducing
 resolve_pseudo_ldimm64

On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 06:23:13PM -0700, Hao Luo wrote:
> Commit 4976b718c355 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id") switched
> the order of check_subprogs() and resolve_pseudo_ldimm() in
> the verifier. Now an empty prog expects to see the error "last
> insn is not an the prog of a single invalid ldimm exit or jmp"
> instead, because the check for subprogs comes first. It's now
> pointless to validate that half of ldimm64 won't be the last
> instruction.
> 
> Tested:
>  # ./test_verifier
>  Summary: 1129 PASSED, 537 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>  and the full set of bpf selftests.
> 
> Fixes: 4976b718c355 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id")
> Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
> ---
> Changelog in v2:
>  - Remove the original test_verifier ld_imm64 test4
>  - Updated commit message.
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c  |  2 +-
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c | 24 +++++++------------
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c
> index b8d18642653a..de84f0d57082 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  	"empty prog",
>  	.insns = {
>  	},
> -	.errstr = "unknown opcode 00",
> +	.errstr = "last insn is not an exit or jmp",
>  	.result = REJECT,
>  },
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c
> index 3856dba733e9..ed6a34991216 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c
> @@ -54,21 +54,13 @@
>  	"test5 ld_imm64",
>  	.insns = {
>  	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 0),
> -	},
> -	.errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn",
> -	.result = REJECT,
> -},
> -{
> -	"test6 ld_imm64",
> -	.insns = {
> -	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 0),
>  	BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
>  	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
>  	},
>  	.result = ACCEPT,
>  },
>  {
> -	"test7 ld_imm64",
> +	"test6 ld_imm64",
>  	.insns = {
>  	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 1),
>  	BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 1),
> @@ -78,7 +70,7 @@
>  	.retval = 1,
>  },
>  {
> -	"test8 ld_imm64",
> +	"test7 ld_imm64",

imo that's too much churn to rename all of them.
Just delete one.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists