[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59b4dd07-16c5-f831-d27f-8c5d4f50d534@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:33:26 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: "Pujari, Bimmy" <bimmy.pujari@...el.com>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"kafai@...com" <kafai@...com>,
"Nikravesh, Ashkan" <ashkan.nikravesh@...el.com>,
"Alvarez, Daniel A" <daniel.a.alvarez@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/2] selftests/bpf: Selftest for real time
helper
On 10/5/20 10:36 AM, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
>> Don't bother. This helper is no go.
>
> I disagree on the 'no go' -- I do think we should have this helper.
+1
>
> Lets not make bpf even harder to use then it already is...
>
Logging is done using time of day; that is not a posix mistake but a
real need. Users do not file complaints based on a server's boot time or
some random monotonic time; they report a problem based on time-of-day.
Allowing bpf programs to timeofday makes it easier to troubleshoot and
correlate kernel side events to userspace logs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists