lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 19:28:57 -0700 From: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com> Subject: [PATCH v3] selftests/bpf: Fix test_verifier after introducing resolve_pseudo_ldimm64 Commit 4976b718c355 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id") switched the order of check_subprogs() and resolve_pseudo_ldimm() in the verifier. Now an empty prog expects to see the error "last insn is not an the prog of a single invalid ldimm exit or jmp" instead, because the check for subprogs comes first. It's now pointless to validate that half of ldimm64 won't be the last instruction. Tested: # ./test_verifier Summary: 1129 PASSED, 537 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED and the full set of bpf selftests. Fixes: 4976b718c355 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id") Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com> --- Changelog in v3: - Remove without renaming the rest Changelog in v2: - Remove the test instead of modifying the err msg. tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c | 8 -------- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c index b8d18642653a..de84f0d57082 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ "empty prog", .insns = { }, - .errstr = "unknown opcode 00", + .errstr = "last insn is not an exit or jmp", .result = REJECT, }, { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c index 3856dba733e9..f9297900cea6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c @@ -50,14 +50,6 @@ .errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn", .result = REJECT, }, -{ - "test5 ld_imm64", - .insns = { - BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 0), - }, - .errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn", - .result = REJECT, -}, { "test6 ld_imm64", .insns = { -- 2.28.0.806.g8561365e88-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists