lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue,  6 Oct 2020 19:28:57 -0700
From:   Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] selftests/bpf: Fix test_verifier after introducing resolve_pseudo_ldimm64

Commit 4976b718c355 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id") switched
the order of check_subprogs() and resolve_pseudo_ldimm() in
the verifier. Now an empty prog expects to see the error "last
insn is not an the prog of a single invalid ldimm exit or jmp"
instead, because the check for subprogs comes first. It's now
pointless to validate that half of ldimm64 won't be the last
instruction.

Tested:
 # ./test_verifier
 Summary: 1129 PASSED, 537 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
 and the full set of bpf selftests.

Fixes: 4976b718c355 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id")
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
---
Changelog in v3:
 - Remove without renaming the rest

Changelog in v2:
 - Remove the test instead of modifying the err msg.

 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c    | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c | 8 --------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c
index b8d18642653a..de84f0d57082 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 	"empty prog",
 	.insns = {
 	},
-	.errstr = "unknown opcode 00",
+	.errstr = "last insn is not an exit or jmp",
 	.result = REJECT,
 },
 {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c
index 3856dba733e9..f9297900cea6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c
@@ -50,14 +50,6 @@
 	.errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn",
 	.result = REJECT,
 },
-{
-	"test5 ld_imm64",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 0),
-	},
-	.errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn",
-	.result = REJECT,
-},
 {
 	"test6 ld_imm64",
 	.insns = {
-- 
2.28.0.806.g8561365e88-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists