[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <710c74d0-61f8-a1ae-e979-4143f26dfe75@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 16:32:37 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@...irst.fr>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] neigh: add netlink filtering based on LLADDR for
dump
On 10/8/20 12:59 PM, Florent Fourcot wrote:
> neighbours table dump supports today two filtering:
> * based on interface index
> * based on master index
>
> This patch adds a new filtering, based on layer two address. That will
> help to replace something like it:
>
> ip neigh show | grep aa:11:22:bb:ee:ff
>
> by a better command:
>
> ip neigh show lladdr aa:11:22:bb:ee:ff
>
> Signed-off-by: Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@...irst.fr>
> ---
> net/core/neighbour.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
> index 8e39e28b0a8d..4b32bf49a005 100644
> --- a/net/core/neighbour.c
> +++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
> @@ -2542,9 +2542,25 @@ static bool neigh_ifindex_filtered(struct net_device *dev, int filter_idx)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static bool neigh_lladdr_filtered(struct neighbour *neigh, const u8 *lladdr)
> +{
> + if (!lladdr)
> + return false;
> +
> + /* Ignore all empty values when lladdr filtering is set */
> + if (!neigh->dev->addr_len)
> + return true;
> +
> + if (memcmp(lladdr, neigh->ha, neigh->dev->addr_len) != 0)
Where do you check that lladdr contains exactly neigh->dev->addr_len bytes ?
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> struct neigh_dump_filter {
> int master_idx;
> int dev_idx;
> + void *lladdr;
> };
>
> static int neigh_dump_table(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct sk_buff *skb,
> @@ -2558,7 +2574,7 @@ static int neigh_dump_table(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct neigh_hash_table *nht;
> unsigned int flags = NLM_F_MULTI;
>
> - if (filter->dev_idx || filter->master_idx)
> + if (filter->dev_idx || filter->master_idx || filter->lladdr)
> flags |= NLM_F_DUMP_FILTERED;
>
> rcu_read_lock_bh();
> @@ -2573,7 +2589,8 @@ static int neigh_dump_table(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct sk_buff *skb,
> if (idx < s_idx || !net_eq(dev_net(n->dev), net))
> goto next;
> if (neigh_ifindex_filtered(n->dev, filter->dev_idx) ||
> - neigh_master_filtered(n->dev, filter->master_idx))
> + neigh_master_filtered(n->dev, filter->master_idx) ||
> + neigh_lladdr_filtered(n, filter->lladdr))
> goto next;
> if (neigh_fill_info(skb, n, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid,
> cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq,
> @@ -2689,6 +2706,9 @@ static int neigh_valid_dump_req(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> case NDA_MASTER:
> filter->master_idx = nla_get_u32(tb[i]);
> break;
> + case NDA_LLADDR:
> + filter->lladdr = nla_data(tb[i]);
This comes from user space, and could contains an arbitrary amount of bytes, like 0 byte.
You probably have to store the full attribute, so that you can use nla_len() and nla_data()
> + break;
> default:
> if (strict_check) {
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Unsupported attribute in neighbor dump request");
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists