netdev - Re: [PATCH net 001/117] mac80211: set .owner to THIS_MODULE in debugfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e385f0c4d37812d9e69369645082baf4a352b6c3.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Thu, 08 Oct 2020 18:06:56 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, wil6210@....qualcomm.com,
        b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 001/117] mac80211: set .owner to THIS_MODULE in
 debugfs_netdev.c

On Thu, 2020-10-08 at 15:50 +0000, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> If THIS_MODULE is not set, the module would be removed while debugfs is
> being used.
> It eventually makes kernel panic.
> 
Wow, 117 practically identical patches? No thanks ...

Can you merge the ones that belong to a single driver?

net/mac80211/ -> mac80211
net/wireless/ -> cfg80211

etc.

I don't think we need more than one patch for each driver/subsystem.

johannes