lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSdWYDs5u+3VzpTA1-Xs1OiVzv8QiKGTH4GUYrvXFfGT_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:19:48 -0400
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Xie He <xie.he.0141@...il.com>
Cc:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzbot <syzbot+4a2c52677a8a1aa283cb@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        William Tu <u9012063@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] ip_gre: set dev->hard_header_len properly

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 3:17 PM Xie He <xie.he.0141@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:04 PM Willem de Bruijn
> <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 1:34 PM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The uninit data is allocated by packet_alloc_skb(), if dev->hard_header_len
> > > is 0 and 'len' is anything between [0, tunnel->hlen + sizeof(struct iphdr)),
> > > dev_validate_header() still returns true obviously but only 'len'
> > > bytes are copied
> > > from user-space by skb_copy_datagram_from_iter(). Therefore, those bytes
> > > within range (len, tunnel->hlen + sizeof(struct iphdr)] are uninitialized.
> >
> > With dev->hard_header_len of zero, packet_alloc_skb() only allocates len bytes.
> >
> > With SOCK_RAW, the writer is expected to write the ip and gre header
> > and include these in the send len argument. The only difference I see
> > is that with hard_header_len the data starts reserve bytes before
> > skb_network_header, and an additional tail has been allocated that is
> > not used.
> >
> > But this also fixes a potentially more serious bug. With SOCK_DGRAM,
> > dev_hard_header/ipgre_header just assumes that there is enough room in
> > the packet to skb_push(skb, t->hlen + sizeof(*iph)). Which may be
> > false if this header length had not been reserved.
> >
> > Though I've mainly looked at packet_snd. Perhaps you are referring to
> > tpacket_snd?
>
> I think what Cong means is that hard_header_len has to be set properly
> to prevent an AF_PACKET/RAW user from sending a frame that is too
> short (shorter than the header length). When an AF_PACKET/RAW user
> sends a frame shorter than the header length, and the code on the
> sending path still expects a full header, it will read uninitialized
> data.

Yes, that makes sense, thanks. Our message crossed :)

> If my understanding is right, I agree on this part.
>
> However, there's something I don't understand in the GRE code. The
> ipgre_header function only creates an IP header (20 bytes) + a GRE
> base header (4 bytes), but pushes and returns "t->hlen +
> sizeof(*iph)". What is t->hlen?

GRE is variable length depending on flags:

        tunnel->tun_hlen = gre_calc_hlen(tunnel->parms.o_flags);


> It seems to me it is the sum of
> t->tun_hlen and t->encap_hlen. What are these two?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ