lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 08 Oct 2020 12:10:08 +0200
From:   Jérôme Pouiller <>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
        Kalle Valo <>
        "David S . Miller" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] wfx: move out from the staging area

On Thursday 8 October 2020 09:30:06 CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
> Yes, the driver needs to be reviewed in linux-wireless list. I recommend
> submitting the whole driver in a patchset with one file per patch, which
> seems to be the easiest way to review a full driver. The final move will
> be in just one commit moving the driver, just like patch 7 does here. As
> an example see how wilc1000 review was done.

I see. I suppose it is still a bit complicated to review? Maybe I could
try to make things easier.

For my submission to staging/ I had taken time to split the driver in an
understandable series of patches[1]. I think it was easier to review than
just sending files one by one. I could do the same thing for the
submission to linux-wireless. It would ask me a bit of work but, since I
already have a template, it is conceivable.

Do you think it is worth it, or it would be an unnecessary effort?

     or commits a7a91ca5a23d^..40115bbc40e2

Jérôme Pouiller

Powered by blists - more mailing lists