lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 12:10:08 +0200 From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] wfx: move out from the staging area On Thursday 8 October 2020 09:30:06 CEST Kalle Valo wrote: [...] > Yes, the driver needs to be reviewed in linux-wireless list. I recommend > submitting the whole driver in a patchset with one file per patch, which > seems to be the easiest way to review a full driver. The final move will > be in just one commit moving the driver, just like patch 7 does here. As > an example see how wilc1000 review was done. I see. I suppose it is still a bit complicated to review? Maybe I could try to make things easier. For my submission to staging/ I had taken time to split the driver in an understandable series of patches[1]. I think it was easier to review than just sending files one by one. I could do the same thing for the submission to linux-wireless. It would ask me a bit of work but, since I already have a template, it is conceivable. Do you think it is worth it, or it would be an unnecessary effort? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/driverdev-devel/20190919142527.31797-1-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com/ or commits a7a91ca5a23d^..40115bbc40e2 -- Jérôme Pouiller
Powered by blists - more mailing lists