netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 09/13] bpf: introduce multibuff support to bpf_prog_test_run

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201008124604.05db39e8@carbon>
Date:   Thu, 8 Oct 2020 12:46:04 +0200
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:     Shay Agroskin <shayagr@...zon.com>
Cc:     Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <sameehj@...zon.com>,
        <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>, <echaudro@...hat.com>,
        brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 09/13] bpf: introduce multibuff support to
 bpf_prog_test_run_xdp()

On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:06:14 +0300
Shay Agroskin <shayagr@...zon.com> wrote:

> Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org> writes:
> 
> > Introduce the capability to allocate a xdp multi-buff in
> > bpf_prog_test_run_xdp routine. This is a preliminary patch to 
> > introduce
> > the selftests for new xdp multi-buff ebpf helpers
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  net/bpf/test_run.c | 51  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> > index bd291f5f539c..ec7286cd051b 100644
> > --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> > +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> > @@ -617,44 +617,79 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog 
> > *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
> >  {
> >  	u32 tailroom = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct 
> >  skb_shared_info));
> >  	u32 headroom = XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM;
> > -	u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
> >  	u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
> >  	struct netdev_rx_queue *rxqueue;
> > +	struct skb_shared_info *sinfo;
> >  	struct xdp_buff xdp = {};
> > +	u32 max_data_sz, size;
> >  	u32 retval, duration;
> > -	u32 max_data_sz;
> > +	int i, ret, data_len;
> >  	void *data;
> > -	int ret;
> >  
> >  	if (kattr->test.ctx_in || kattr->test.ctx_out)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  
> > -	/* XDP have extra tailroom as (most) drivers use full page 
> > */
> >  	max_data_sz = 4096 - headroom - tailroom;  
> 
> For the sake of consistency, can this 4096 be changed to PAGE_SIZE 
> ?

The size 4096 is explicitly use, because the selftest xdp_adjust_tail
expect this, else it will fail on ARCHs with 64K PAGE_SIZE.  It also
seems excessive to create 64K packets for testing XDP.

See: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c

> Same as in
>      data_len = min_t(int, kattr->test.data_size_in - size, 
>      PAGE_SIZE);
> 
> expression below



-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer