netdev - Re: [PATCH nf v2] netfilter: conntrack: connection timeout after re-register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201009200548.GG5723@breakpoint.cc>
Date:   Fri, 9 Oct 2020 22:05:48 +0200
From:   Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:     Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>
Cc:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, coreteam@...filter.org,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf v2] netfilter: conntrack: connection timeout after
 re-register

Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org> wrote:
> > The "delay unregister" remark was wrt. the "all rules were deleted"
> > case, i.e. add a "grace period" rather than acting right away when
> > conntrack use count did hit 0.
> 
> Now I understand it, thanks really. The hooks are removed, so conntrack 
> cannot "see" the packets and the entries become stale. 

Yes.

> What is the rationale behind "remove the conntrack hooks when there are no 
> rule left referring to conntrack"? Performance optimization? But then the 
> content of the whole conntrack table could be deleted too... ;-)

Yes, this isn't the case at the moment -- only hooks are removed,
entries will eventually time out.

> > Conntrack entries are not removed, only the base hooks get unregistered. 
> > This is a problem for tcp window tracking.
> > 
> > When re-register occurs, kernel is supposed to switch the existing 
> > entries to "loose" mode so window tracking won't flag packets as 
> > invalid, but apparently this isn't enough to handle keepalive case.
> 
> "loose" (nf_ct_tcp_loose) mode doesn't disable window tracking, it 
> enables/disables picking up already established connections. 
> 
> nf_ct_tcp_be_liberal would disable TCP window checking (but not tracking) 
> for non RST packets.

You are right, mixup on my part.

> But both seems to be modified only via the proc entries.

Yes, we iterate table on re-register and modify the existing entries.