[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f32bfccf-c659-e82e-08c2-f863eb267610@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 23:27:09 -0700
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: "Nikita V. Shirokov" <tehnerd@...nerd.com>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: add tcp_notsent_lowat bpf setsockopt
On 10/8/20 10:08 PM, Nikita V. Shirokov wrote:
> Adding support for TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT sockoption
> (https://lwn.net/Articles/560082/ ) in tcpbpf
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikita V. Shirokov <tehnerd@...nerd.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
> net/core/filter.c | 4 ++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect4_prog.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index d83561e8cd2c..42d2df799397 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1698,7 +1698,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
> * **TCP_CONGESTION**, **TCP_BPF_IW**,
> * **TCP_BPF_SNDCWND_CLAMP**, **TCP_SAVE_SYN**,
> * **TCP_KEEPIDLE**, **TCP_KEEPINTVL**, **TCP_KEEPCNT**,
> - * **TCP_SYNCNT**, **TCP_USER_TIMEOUT**.
> + * **TCP_SYNCNT**, **TCP_USER_TIMEOUT**, **TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT**.
> * * **IPPROTO_IP**, which supports *optname* **IP_TOS**.
> * * **IPPROTO_IPV6**, which supports *optname* **IPV6_TCLASS**.
> * Return
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 05df73780dd3..5da44b11e1ec 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -4827,6 +4827,10 @@ static int _bpf_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> else
> icsk->icsk_user_timeout = val;
> break;
> + case TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT:
> + tp->notsent_lowat = val;
> + sk->sk_write_space(sk);
> + break;
This looks good to me. It is the same as in do_tcp_setsockopt().
> default:
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect4_prog.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect4_prog.c
> index b1b2773c0b9d..b10e7fbace7b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect4_prog.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect4_prog.c
> @@ -128,6 +128,18 @@ static __inline int set_keepalive(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static __inline int set_notsent_lowat(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
> +{
> + int lowat = 65535;
> +
> + if (ctx->type == SOCK_STREAM) {
> + if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_TCP, TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT, &lowat, sizeof(lowat)))
In my build system, I hit a compilation error.
progs/connect4_prog.c:137:36: error: use of undeclared identifier
'TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT'
if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_TCP, TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT,
&lowat, sizeof(lowat)))
TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT is included in /usr/include/linux/tcp.h. But this file
includes netinet/tcp.h and it contains some same symbol definitions as
linux/tcp.h so I can include both.
Adding the following can fix the issue
#ifndef TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT
#define TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT 25
#endif
Not sure where TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT is defined in your system.
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> SEC("cgroup/connect4")
> int connect_v4_prog(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
> {
> @@ -148,6 +160,9 @@ int connect_v4_prog(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
> if (set_keepalive(ctx))
> return 0;
>
> + if (set_notsent_lowat(ctx))
> + return 0;
> +
> if (ctx->type != SOCK_STREAM && ctx->type != SOCK_DGRAM)
> return 0;
> else if (ctx->type == SOCK_STREAM)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists