[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <909c84e4-d779-e8a8-827b-3892849c2294@hartkopp.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:35:08 +0200
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, kuba@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] can-isotp: implement cleanups /
improvements from review
On 12.10.20 10:30, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 10/12/20 10:11 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12.10.20 10:05, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>> On 10/12/20 9:43 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>>>> As pointed out by Jakub Kicinski here:
>>>> http://lore.kernel.org/r/20201009175751.5c54097f@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com
>>>> this patch addresses the remarked issues:
>>>>
>>>> - remove empty line in comment
>>>> - remove default=y for CAN_ISOTP in Kconfig
>>>> - make use of pr_notice_once()
>>>> - use GFP_ATOMIC instead of gfp_any() in soft hrtimer context
>>>>
>>>> The version strings in the CAN subsystem are removed by a separate patch.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Added both to linux-can-next.
>>
>> The patches were intended for 'net-next' as the merge window will open
>> *very* soon.
>>
>> I'm not sure if there would be another pull from linux-can-next until
>> then, therefore I would suggest that Jakub takes the patches himself.
>
> I don't mind. FWIW, here's the pull request:
>
> http://lore.kernel.org/r/20201012082727.2338859-1-mkl@pengutronix.de
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can-next.git tags/linux-can-next-for-5.10-20201012
>
> Marc
:-D
Well thanks!
I just got the feeling that especially the
"remove default=y for CAN_ISOTP in Kconfig"
issue is urgent in net-next.
So now any way to get the patches is fine.
Thanks & BR,
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists