[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201012091129.57b387ae@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:11:29 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Reji Thomas <rejithomas@...iper.net>
Cc: dlebrun@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rejithomas.d@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH SRv6 End.X] Signed-off-by: Reji Thomas
<rejithomas@...iper.net>
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:07:49 +0530 Reji Thomas wrote:
> seg6: Fix End.X nexthop to use oif.
> Currently End.X action doesn't consider the outgoing interface
> while looking up the nexthop.This breaks packet path functionality
> while using link local address as the End.X nexthop.The patch
> fixes this for link local addresses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Reji Thomas <rejithomas@...iper.net>
Looks like the subject is broken, please resend.
Also - is this a regression or did it never work? Would be good to see
a Fixes tag.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists