netdev - RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] e100: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB289001E5538E536F0CB60A1FBC070@DM6PR11MB2890.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:35:10 +0000
From:   "Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] e100: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API

> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org> On Behalf Of
> Christophe JAILLET
> Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2020 4:56 AM
> To: kuba@...nel.org; davem@...emloft.net; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org; Christophe
> JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] e100: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API
> 
> The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
> 
> The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below and has been
> hand modified to replace GFP_ with a correct flag.
> It has been compile tested.
> 
> When memory is allocated in 'e100_alloc()', GFP_KERNEL can be used because
> it is only called from the probe function and no lock is acquired.
> 
> 
> @@
> @@
> -    PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
> +    DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
> 
> @@
> @@
> -    PCI_DMA_TODEVICE
> +    DMA_TO_DEVICE
> 
> @@
> @@
> -    PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE
> +    DMA_FROM_DEVICE
> 
> @@
> @@
> -    PCI_DMA_NONE
> +    DMA_NONE
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3;
> @@
> -    pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
> +    dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3;
> @@
> -    pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
> +    dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5;
> @@
> -    pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5)
> +    dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> -    pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> +    dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> -    pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2)
> +    dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> -    pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> +    dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
> 
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> -    pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> +    dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> If needed, see post from Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
>    https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
And I finally managed to get a couple functional e100 adapters up and running again.
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>