lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:18:58 +1300
From:   Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To:     andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        olteanv@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        linux@...linux.org.uk
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Support serdes ports on MV88E6097

Implement serdes_power, serdes_get_lane and serdes_pcs_get_state ops for
the MV88E6097 so that ports 8 & 9 can be supported as serdes ports and
directly connected to other network interfaces or to SFPs without a PHY.

Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
---

This should be usable for all variants of the 88E6185 that have
tri-speed capable ports (which is why I used the mv88e6185 prefix
instead of mv88e6097). But my hardware only has a 88e6097 so I've only
connected up the ops for that chip.

 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index 1ef392ee52c5..1c6cd5c43eb1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
@@ -3436,6 +3436,64 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_set_eeprom(struct dsa_switch *ds,
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int mv88e6185_serdes_power(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port, u8 lane,
+				  bool up)
+{
+	/* The serdes power can't be controlled on this switch chip but we need
+	 * to supply this function to avoid returning -EOPNOTSUPP in
+	 * mv88e6xxx_serdes_power_up/mv88e6xxx_serdes_power_down
+	 */
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static u8 mv88e6185_serdes_get_lane(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port)
+{
+	switch (chip->ports[port].cmode) {
+	case MV88E6185_PORT_STS_CMODE_SERDES:
+	case MV88E6185_PORT_STS_CMODE_1000BASE_X:
+		return port;
+	default:
+		return 0;
+	}
+}
+
+static int mv88e6185_serdes_pcs_get_state(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
+					  u8 lane, struct phylink_link_state *state)
+{
+	int err;
+	u16 status;
+
+	err = mv88e6xxx_port_read(chip, port, MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS, &status);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	state->link = !!(status & MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_LINK);
+
+	if (state->link) {
+		state->duplex = status & MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_DUPLEX ? DUPLEX_FULL : DUPLEX_HALF;
+
+		switch (status &  MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_SPEED_MASK) {
+		case MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_SPEED_1000:
+			state->speed = SPEED_1000;
+			break;
+		case MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_SPEED_100:
+			state->speed = SPEED_100;
+			break;
+		case MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_SPEED_10:
+			state->speed = SPEED_10;
+			break;
+		default:
+			dev_err(chip->dev, "invalid PHY speed\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	} else {
+		state->duplex = DUPLEX_UNKNOWN;
+		state->speed = SPEED_UNKNOWN;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static const struct mv88e6xxx_ops mv88e6085_ops = {
 	/* MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6097 */
 	.ieee_pri_map = mv88e6085_g1_ieee_pri_map,
@@ -3534,6 +3592,9 @@ static const struct mv88e6xxx_ops mv88e6097_ops = {
 	.set_egress_port = mv88e6095_g1_set_egress_port,
 	.watchdog_ops = &mv88e6097_watchdog_ops,
 	.mgmt_rsvd2cpu = mv88e6352_g2_mgmt_rsvd2cpu,
+	.serdes_power = mv88e6185_serdes_power,
+	.serdes_get_lane = mv88e6185_serdes_get_lane,
+	.serdes_pcs_get_state = mv88e6185_serdes_pcs_get_state,
 	.pot_clear = mv88e6xxx_g2_pot_clear,
 	.reset = mv88e6352_g1_reset,
 	.rmu_disable = mv88e6085_g1_rmu_disable,
-- 
2.28.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists