[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSfRXhJWOerKL=4OV=ku6v3XfqhBhV0=rtiAfaPgr=yq4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:23:31 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
tlfalcon@...ux.ibm.com, cris.forno@....com,
pradeeps@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, wilder@...ibm.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [ PATCH v2 2/2] ibmveth: Identify ingress large send packets.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 7:21 PM David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Ingress large send packets are identified by either:
> The IBMVETH_RXQ_LRG_PKT flag in the receive buffer
> or with a -1 placed in the ip header checksum.
> The method used depends on firmware version. Frame
> geometry and sufficient header validation is performed by the
> hypervisor eliminating the need for further header checks here.
>
> Fixes: 7b5967389f5a ("ibmveth: set correct gso_size and gso_type")
> Signed-off-by: David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cristobal Forno <cris.forno@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Pradeep Satyanarayana <pradeeps@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Thanks for clarifying the header validation. I clearly had missed that :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists