netdev - Re: [PATCH nf v2] netfilter: conntrack: connection timeout after re-register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201014193551.GD16895@breakpoint.cc>
Date:   Wed, 14 Oct 2020 21:35:51 +0200
From:   Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:     Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com>
Cc:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, coreteam@...filter.org,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf v2] netfilter: conntrack: connection timeout after
 re-register

Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 1:23 AM Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
> >
> > Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
> > > Legacy would still be flawed though.
> >
> > Its fine too, new rule blob gets handled (and match/target checkentry
> > called) before old one is dismantled.
> >
> > We only have a 0 refcount + hook unregister when rules get
> > flushed/removed explicitly.
> 
> Should the patch be used in the meantime while this gets
> worked out?

I think the patch is correct, and I do NOT see a better solution.