netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] macb: support the 2-deep Tx queue on at91

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201013201307.48976984@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Oct 2020 20:13:07 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:     Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] macb: support the 2-deep Tx queue on at91

On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 05:06:30 +0200 Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > LGTM. There's always a chance that this will make other 
> > designs explode, but short of someone from Cadence giving 
> > us a timely review we have only one way to find that out.. :)  
> 
> Not that much in fact, given that the at91ether_* functions are only
> used by AT91RM9200 (whose datasheet I used to do this) and Mstar which
> I used for the tests. I initially wanted to get my old SAM9G20 board
> to boot until I noticed that it doesn't even use the same set of
> functions, so the potential victims are extremely limited :-)

GTK :)