netdev - Re: [PATCH ipsec] xfrm: interface: fix the priorities for ipip and ipv6 tunnels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:00:02 +0200
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
CC:     Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec] xfrm: interface: fix the priorities for ipip and
 ipv6 tunnels

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 02:41:18PM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 13/10/2020 à 11:28, Steffen Klassert a écrit :
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 04:13:24PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> >> As Nicolas noticed in his case, when xfrm_interface module is installed
> >> the standard IP tunnels will break in receiving packets.
> >>
> >> This is caused by the IP tunnel handlers with a higher priority in xfrm
> >> interface processing incoming packets by xfrm_input(), which would drop
> >> the packets and return 0 instead when anything wrong happens.
> >>
> >> Rather than changing xfrm_input(), this patch is to adjust the priority
> >> for the IP tunnel handlers in xfrm interface, so that the packets would
> >> go to xfrmi's later than the others', as the others' would not drop the
> >> packets when the handlers couldn't process them.
> >>
> >> Note that IPCOMP also defines its own IPIP tunnel handler and it calls
> >> xfrm_input() as well, so we must make its priority lower than xfrmi's,
> >> which means having xfrmi loaded would still break IPCOMP. We may seek
> >> another way to fix it in xfrm_input() in the future.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
> >> Tested-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
> >> Fixes: da9bbf0598c9 ("xfrm: interface: support IPIP and IPIP6 tunnels processing with .cb_handler")
> >> FIxes: d7b360c2869f ("xfrm: interface: support IP6IP6 and IP6IP tunnels processing with .cb_handler")
> >> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> > 
> > Applied, thanks a lot Xin!
> > 
> Is it possible to queue this for stable branches?

Yes, it will go to stable after it is intergated into the mainline.