[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb02626b-71bd-360d-c864-5dac2a1a7603@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 09:59:10 +0200
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
Igor Mitsyanko <imitsyanko@...ntenna.com>,
Sergey Matyukevich <geomatsi@...il.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/12] net: add and use function
dev_fetch_sw_netstats for fetching pcpu_sw_netstats
On 14.10.2020 09:53, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 08:13:47AM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> On 14.10.2020 07:42, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 05:39:51PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:00:11 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>>>> In several places the same code is used to populate rtnl_link_stats64
>>>>> fields with data from pcpu_sw_netstats. Therefore factor out this code
>>>>> to a new function dev_fetch_sw_netstats().
>>>>>
>>>>> v2:
>>>>> - constify argument netstats
>>>>> - don't ignore netstats being NULL or an ERRPTR
>>>>> - switch to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>>>>
>>>> Applied, thank you!
>>>
>>> Jakub,
>>>
>>> Is it possible to make sure that changelogs are not part of the commit
>>> messages? We don't store previous revisions in the git repo, so it doesn't
>>> give too much to anyone who is looking on git log later. The lore link
>>> to the patch is more than enough.
>>>
>> I remember that once I did it the usual way (changelog below the ---) David
>> requested the changelog to be part of the commit message. So obviously he
>> sees some benefit in doing so.
>
> Do you have a link? What is the benefit and how can we use it?
>
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1873080.html
> Usually such request comes to ensure that commit message is updated with
> extra information (explanation) existed in changelog which is missing in
> the patch.
>
> Thanks
>
>>
>>> 44fa32f008ab ("net: add function dev_fetch_sw_netstats for fetching pcpu_sw_netstats")
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists