netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: sockmap: Don't call bpf_prog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:45:55 +0100
From:   Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc:     John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sockmap: Don't call bpf_prog_put() on NULL pointer

On 14/10/2020 10:32, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 07:09 PM CEST, Alex Dewar wrote:
>> If bpf_prog_inc_not_zero() fails for skb_parser, then bpf_prog_put() is
>> called unconditionally on skb_verdict, even though it may be NULL. Fix
>> and tidy up error path.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1497799: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL)
>> Fixes: 743df8b7749f ("bpf, sockmap: Check skb_verdict and skb_parser programs explicitly")
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>
>> ---
> Note to maintainers: the issue exists only in bpf-next where we have:
>
>    https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/160239294756.8495.5796595770890272219.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower/
>
> The patch also looks like it is supposed to be applied on top of the above.
Yes, the patch is based on linux-next.