[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201015122624.0ca7b58c@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:26:24 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpfilter: Fix build error with CONFIG_BPFILTER_UMH
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:03:14 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:56 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > How so? It's using in-tree headers instead of system ones.
> > Many samples seem to be doing the same thing.
>
> There is no such thing as "usr/include" in the kernel build and source trees.
Hm. I thought bpfilter somehow depends on make headers. But it doesn't
seem to. Reverting now.
> > > Also please don't take bpf patches.
> >
> > You had it marked it as netdev in your patchwork :/
>
> It was delegated automatically by the patchwork system.
> I didn't have time to reassign, but you should have known better
> when you saw 'bpfilter' in the subject.
The previous committers for bpfilter are almost all Dave, so I checked
your patchwork to make sure and it was netdev...
I'll do better next time :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists