[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <2EF3C673-B68F-4CA8-928E-07B72586434F@fh-muenster.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 23:35:28 +0200
From: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@...muenster.de>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"gnault@...hat.com" <gnault@...hat.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com" <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 16/16] sctp: enable udp tunneling socks
> On 15. Oct 2020, at 23:23, David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> wrote:
>
> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
>> Sent: 15 October 2020 18:43
>>
>> Actually..
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 03:27:41PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
>> ...
>>> Also add sysctl udp_port to allow changing the listening
>>> sock's port by users.
>
> I've not read through this change...
>
> But surely the UDP port (or ports) that you need to use
> will depend on the remote system's configuration.
The local encapsulation port can be system wide, the remote encapsulation port
is per remote address. See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6951#section-5.1
Best regards
Michael
>
> So they need to be a property of the socket, not a
> system-wide value.
>
> I can easily imagine my M3UA code connecting to different
> network providers which have decided to use different
> UDP port numbers.
>
> David
>
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
>
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (5257 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists