netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: point out the tail taggers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201016201930.2i2lw4aixklyg6j7@skbuf>
Date:   Fri, 16 Oct 2020 23:19:30 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
        kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: point out the tail taggers

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 10:14:28PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 08:33:17PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 01:25:08AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > Hi Christian,
> > >
> > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> > >
> > > [auto build test ERROR on net/master]
> > >
> > > url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Christian-Eggers/net-dsa-point-out-the-tail-taggers/20201017-003007
> > > base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git 2ecbc1f684482b4ed52447a39903bd9b0f222898
> 
> > Is the test bot being a bit "slow" today?
> 
> It is using the net.git commit from yesterday afternoon. net-next got
> merged into net yesterday evening, so it is a bit behind, but not too
> far behind.

Exactly. The sha1sum it uses _does_ contain the tail_tag member inside
struct dsa_device_ops. What's it complaining about?