netdev - Re: realtek PHY commit bbc4d71d63549 causes regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAC_iWj+yd27cSZMu_+4j=1639y4c07CziTMR03A-kDcWwXHO9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 17 Oct 2020 19:21:58 +0300
From:   Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "open list:BPF JIT for MIPS (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Willy Liu <willy.liu@...ltek.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: realtek PHY commit bbc4d71d63549 causes regression

Hi Ard,

[...]
> > > > You can also use '' as the phy-mode, which results in
> > > > PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA, which effectively means, don't touch the PHY
> > > > mode, something else has already set it up. This might actually be the
> > > > correct way to go for ACPI. In the DT world, we tend to assume the
> > > > bootloader has done the absolute minimum and Linux should configure
> > > > everything. The ACPI takes the opposite view, the firmware will do the
> > > > basic hardware configuration, and Linux should not touch it, or ask
> > > > ACPI to modify it.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Indeed, the firmware should have set this up.
> >
> > Would EDK2 take care of the RGMII Rx/Tx delays even when configured to
> > use a DT instead of ACPI?
> >
>
> Yes. The network driver has no awareness whatsoever which h/w
> description is being provided to the OS.
>
>
> > > This would mean we could > do this in the driver: it currently uses
> > >
> > > priv->phy_interface = device_get_phy_mode(&pdev->dev);
> > >
> > > Can we just assign that to PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA instead?
> >
>
> I have tried this, and it seems to fix the issue. I will send out a
> patch against the netsec driver.

Great thanks!

Cheers
/Ilias