[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201018203225.GA1790657@apalos.home>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 23:32:25 +0300
From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Willy Liu <willy.liu@...ltek.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@...aro.org>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netsec: ignore 'phy-mode' device property on ACPI
systems
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 07:52:18PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/socionext-netsec.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/socionext-netsec.txt
> > @@ -30,7 +30,9 @@ Optional properties: (See ethernet.txt file in the same directory)
> > - max-frame-size: See ethernet.txt in the same directory.
> >
> > The MAC address will be determined using the optional properties
> > -defined in ethernet.txt.
> > +defined in ethernet.txt. The 'phy-mode' property is required, but may
> > +be set to the empty string if the PHY configuration is programmed by
> > +the firmware or set by hardware straps, and needs to be preserved.
>
> In general, phy-mode is not mandatory. of_get_phy_mode() does the
> right thing if it is not found, it sets &priv->phy_interface to
> PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA, but returns -ENODEV. Also, it does not break
> backwards compatibility to convert a mandatory property to
> optional. So you could just do
>
> of_get_phy_mode(pdev->dev.of_node, &priv->phy_interface);
>
> skip all the error checking, and document it as optional.
Why ?
The patch as is will not affect systems built on any firmware implementations
that use ACPI and somehow configure the hardware.
Although the only firmware implementations I am aware of on upsteream are based
on EDK2, I prefer the explicit error as is now, in case a firmware does on
initialize the PHY properly (and is using a DT).
Cheers
/Ilias
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists