netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH 06/10] octeontx2-af: Add NIX1 interfaces to NPC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALHRZuq+_CojmKZgrNdzM0LSA4tn9jgpyk2m3F-j=87vM1FKjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:15:06 +0530
From:   sundeep subbaraya <sundeep.lkml@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        rsaladi2@...vell.com, Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
        Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 06/10] octeontx2-af: Add NIX1 interfaces to NPC

Hi Jakub,

On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 9:41 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 10:22:26 +0530 sundeep subbaraya wrote:
> > > Let me rephrase the question - can the AF driver only run on the SoC
> > > or are there configurations in which host can control the AF?
> > >
> > > I see that Kconfig depends on ARM64 but is that what you choose
> > > to support or a HW limitation?
> >
> > AF driver only run on SoC and SoC is ARM64 based. Host cannot control the AF.
> > Depends on ARM64 is HW limitation.
>
> Okay, modifying the global data is probably acceptable then.
>
> Nothing else caught my eye here, please repost when net-next reopens.
>
> Thanks!

Sure. Will post again.

Thanks,
Sundeep