netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 1/2] bpf_redirect_neigh: Support supplying the nexthop as a helper parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87tuuqe02j.fsf@toke.dk>
Date:   Mon, 19 Oct 2020 16:56:36 +0200
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 1/2] bpf_redirect_neigh: Support supplying
 the nexthop as a helper parameter

Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> writes:

> On 10/15/20 5:46 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
>> 
>> Based on the discussion in [0], update the bpf_redirect_neigh() helper to
>> accept an optional parameter specifying the nexthop information. This makes
>> it possible to combine bpf_fib_lookup() and bpf_redirect_neigh() without
>> incurring a duplicate FIB lookup - since the FIB lookup helper will return
>> the nexthop information even if no neighbour is present, this can simply be
>> passed on to bpf_redirect_neigh() if bpf_fib_lookup() returns
>> BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_NO_NEIGH.
>> 
>> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/393e17fc-d187-3a8d-2f0d-a627c7c63fca@iogearbox.net/
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
>
> Overall looks good from what I can tell, just small nits below on top of
> David's feedback:
>
> [...]
>> -static int __bpf_redirect_neigh_v4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>> +static int __bpf_redirect_neigh_v4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>> +				   struct bpf_nh_params *nh)
>>   {
>>   	const struct iphdr *ip4h = ip_hdr(skb);
>>   	struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
>>   	int err, ret = NET_XMIT_DROP;
>> -	struct rtable *rt;
>> -	struct flowi4 fl4 = {
>> -		.flowi4_flags	= FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC,
>> -		.flowi4_mark	= skb->mark,
>> -		.flowi4_tos	= RT_TOS(ip4h->tos),
>> -		.flowi4_oif	= dev->ifindex,
>> -		.flowi4_proto	= ip4h->protocol,
>> -		.daddr		= ip4h->daddr,
>> -		.saddr		= ip4h->saddr,
>> -	};
>>   
>> -	rt = ip_route_output_flow(net, &fl4, NULL);
>> -	if (IS_ERR(rt))
>> -		goto out_drop;
>> -	if (rt->rt_type != RTN_UNICAST && rt->rt_type != RTN_LOCAL) {
>> -		ip_rt_put(rt);
>> -		goto out_drop;
>> -	}
>> +	if (!nh->nh_family) {
>> +		struct rtable *rt;
>> +		struct flowi4 fl4 = {
>> +			.flowi4_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC,
>> +			.flowi4_mark = skb->mark,
>> +			.flowi4_tos = RT_TOS(ip4h->tos),
>> +			.flowi4_oif = dev->ifindex,
>> +			.flowi4_proto = ip4h->protocol,
>> +			.daddr = ip4h->daddr,
>> +			.saddr = ip4h->saddr,
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		rt = ip_route_output_flow(net, &fl4, NULL);
>> +		if (IS_ERR(rt))
>> +			goto out_drop;
>> +		if (rt->rt_type != RTN_UNICAST && rt->rt_type != RTN_LOCAL) {
>> +			ip_rt_put(rt);
>> +			goto out_drop;
>> +		}
>>   
>> -	skb_dst_set(skb, &rt->dst);
>> +		skb_dst_set(skb, &rt->dst);
>> +		nh = NULL;
>> +	}
>>   
>> -	err = bpf_out_neigh_v4(net, skb);
>> +	err = bpf_out_neigh_v4(net, skb, dev, nh);
>>   	if (unlikely(net_xmit_eval(err)))
>>   		dev->stats.tx_errors++;
>>   	else
>> @@ -2355,7 +2383,8 @@ static int __bpf_redirect_neigh_v4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>>   }
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_INET */
>>   
>> -static int __bpf_redirect_neigh(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>> +static int __bpf_redirect_neigh(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>> +				struct bpf_nh_params *nh)
>>   {
>>   	struct ethhdr *ethh = eth_hdr(skb);
>>   
>> @@ -2370,9 +2399,9 @@ static int __bpf_redirect_neigh(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>>   	skb_reset_network_header(skb);
>>   
>>   	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP))
>> -		return __bpf_redirect_neigh_v4(skb, dev);
>> +		return __bpf_redirect_neigh_v4(skb, dev, nh);
>>   	else if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6))
>> -		return __bpf_redirect_neigh_v6(skb, dev);
>> +		return __bpf_redirect_neigh_v6(skb, dev, nh);
>>   out:
>>   	kfree_skb(skb);
>>   	return -ENOTSUPP;
>> @@ -2455,8 +2484,8 @@ int skb_do_redirect(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>   		return -EAGAIN;
>>   	}
>>   	return flags & BPF_F_NEIGH ?
>> -	       __bpf_redirect_neigh(skb, dev) :
>> -	       __bpf_redirect(skb, dev, flags);
>> +		__bpf_redirect_neigh(skb, dev, &ri->nh) :
>> +		__bpf_redirect(skb, dev, flags);
>>   out_drop:
>>   	kfree_skb(skb);
>>   	return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -2504,16 +2533,23 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_redirect_peer_proto = {
>>   	.arg2_type      = ARG_ANYTHING,
>>   };
>>   
>> -BPF_CALL_2(bpf_redirect_neigh, u32, ifindex, u64, flags)
>> +BPF_CALL_4(bpf_redirect_neigh, u32, ifindex, struct bpf_redir_neigh *, params,
>> +	   int, plen, u64, flags)
>>   {
>>   	struct bpf_redirect_info *ri = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_redirect_info);
>>   
>> -	if (unlikely(flags))
>> +	if (unlikely((plen && plen < sizeof(*params)) || flags))
>>   		return TC_ACT_SHOT;
>>   
>>   	ri->flags = BPF_F_NEIGH;
>>   	ri->tgt_index = ifindex;
>>   
>> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_redir_neigh) != sizeof(struct bpf_nh_params));
>> +	if (plen)
>> +		memcpy(&ri->nh, params, sizeof(ri->nh));
>> +	else
>> +		ri->nh.nh_family = 0; /* clear previous value */
>
> I'd probably just add an internal flag and do ...
>
>    ri->flags = BPF_F_NEIGH | (plen ? BPF_F_NEXTHOP : 0);
>
> ... instead of above clearing, and skb_do_redirect() then becomes:
>
>    __bpf_redirect_neigh(skb, dev, flags & BPF_F_NEXTHOP ? &ri->nh : NULL)
>
> ... which would then also avoid this !nh->nh_family check where you later on
> set nh = NULL to pass it onwards.

Ah yes, excellent idea! Will fix :)

-Toke