[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7766357d-0838-1603-9967-8910aa312f65@tessares.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:27:55 +0200
From: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
To: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@...il.com>,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Peter Krystad <peter.krystad@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, mptcp@...ts.01.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [MPTCP][PATCH net-next 0/2] init ahmac and port of
mptcp_options_received
Hi Geliang,
On 19/10/2020 12:23, Geliang Tang wrote:
> This patchset deals with initializations of mptcp_options_received's two
> fields, ahmac and port.
>
> Geliang Tang (2):
> mptcp: initialize mptcp_options_received's ahmac
> mptcp: move mptcp_options_received's port initialization
Thank you for these two patches. They look good to me except one detail:
these two patches are for -net and not net-next.
I don't know if it is alright for Jakub to apply them to -net or if it
is clearer to re-send them with an updated subject.
If it is OK to apply them to -net without a re-submit, here is my:
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
Also, if you don't mind and while I am here, I never know: is it OK for
you the maintainers to send one Acked/Reviewed-by for a whole series --
but then this is not reflected on patchwork -- or should we send one tag
for each patch?
Cheers,
Matt
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists