lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201019194219.1051314-1-kafai@fb.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:42:19 -0700
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 2/3] bpf: selftest: Ensure the return value of bpf_skc_to helpers must be checked

This patch tests:

int bpf_cls(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
	/* REG_6: sk
	 * REG_7: tp
	 * REG_8: req_sk
	 */

	sk = skb->sk;
	if (!sk)
		return 0;

	tp = bpf_skc_to_tcp_sock(sk);
	req_sk = bpf_skc_to_tcp_request_sock(sk);
	if (!req_sk)
		return 0;

	/* !tp has not been tested, so verifier should reject. */
	return *(__u8 *)tp;
}

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c
index b1aac2641498..ce13ece08d51 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c
@@ -631,3 +631,28 @@
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_REUSEPORT,
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 },
+{
+	"mark null check on return value of bpf_skc_to helpers",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_skc_to_tcp_sock),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_skc_to_tcp_request_sock),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_8, 0, 2),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.errstr = "invalid mem access",
+	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
+	.errstr_unpriv = "unknown func",
+},
-- 
2.24.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ