[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201019213638.GW139700@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:36:38 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Robert Hancock <robert.hancock@...ian.com>
Cc: radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, michal.simek@...inx.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: axienet: Properly handle PCS/PMA PHY for 1000BaseX
mode
> static void axienet_mac_config(struct phylink_config *config, unsigned int mode,
> const struct phylink_link_state *state)
> {
> - /* nothing meaningful to do */
> + struct net_device *ndev = to_net_dev(config->dev);
> + struct axienet_local *lp = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + switch (state->interface) {
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_1000BASEX:
> + ret = phylink_mii_c22_pcs_config(lp->pcs_phy, mode,
> + state->interface,
> + state->advertising);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + netdev_warn(ndev, "Failed to configure PCS: %d\n",
> + ret);
> +
> + /* Ensure isolate bit is cleared */
> + ret = mdiobus_modify(lp->pcs_phy->bus, lp->pcs_phy->addr,
> + MII_BMCR, BMCR_ISOLATE, 0);
Hi Robert
That looks like a layering violation. Maybe move this into
phylink_mii_c22_pcs_config(), it is accessing MII_BMCR anyway.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists